6 steps in documenting hospital screening to identity patients with nutritional or functional needs

If you have been part or will be part of a Medical Records Review team at a hospital which is already Joint Commission International (JCI) accredited or seeking JCI accreditation status or undergoing re-survey for JCI accreditation status, you will be surprised how so many of the team members do not know the reason for nutritional screening which is the start of the the Nutrition Care Process – even among nurses in the team, and most will even not know where to find such evidence of nutritional screening in the medical record. Most of times, poor documentation in relation to the quality of nutrition documentation can be observed when nutritional screening data is not even gathered and forms left not filled appropriately.

In my opinion, it is the duty of the Medical Records Review team leader to highlight in his or her report non-compliance to nutritional screening among other findings, so that the hospital’s leaders can initiate a structured investigation to identify barriers to compliance for nutritional screening. I also strongly support that there must be an agreed standard for the type and context of screening tool(s) to be used, for example among a group of hospitals under an organisation. I believe standardisation facilitates research into barriers leading to poor documentation in relation to the quality of nutrition documentation, and this will lend credibility and usability of available screening tools for greater compliance.

Below is a diagram which summarises the steps in documenting hospital screening to identity patients with nutritional or functional needs, based on the previous post Hospital screening criteria data to identify patients with nutritional or functional needs (this link will open in a new tab of your current browser).

6 Steps In Documenting Hospital Screening To Identify Patients With Nutritional Or Functional Needs

Hospital screening criteria data to identify patients with nutritional or functional needs

Patient medical records should show evidence that information on nutritional status or functional status is gathered through the application of screening criteria, when patients who are acutely or chronically unwell and who are experiencing dietary difficulties and deficiencies related to or resulting from their illness, first contact hospital services.

From the post Assessments within 24 hours (this link will open in a new tab of your current browser), it is clear that the initial medical and nursing assessments are completed within 24 hours of admission to the hospital  or when the patient’s condition indicates, the initial medical and/or nursing assessment are conducted and available earlier, for use by all those caring for the patient. This means that patients are screened for nutritional risk as part of the initial assessment with the application of screening criteria to gather information on nutritional status or functional status which is often done by nurses, must also be completed routinely within 24 hours of admission to the hospital or at an earlier time period.

Nutritional screening is usually undertaken by nurses and doctors; assessment by dietitians.

GETTY_H_062112_WeightScale

Image credit: abcnewsradioonline.com

Nurses use individual hospital screening criteria to identify patients with nutritional or functional needs like:

  • unexpected weight loss
  • gastrointestinal symptoms
  • obvious emaciation
  • pressure ulcers
  • intravenous or tube feedings

In each case, the screening criteria are developed by qualified individuals with the aim to identify those who are malnourished or ‘at risk’ of becoming so and so able to further assess and, if necessary, to provide any required patient treatment. For example, screening criteria for nutritional risk may be developed by nurses who will apply the criteria, dietitians who will supply the recommended dietary intervention, and nutritionists able to integrate nutritional needs with the other needs of the patient.

Referencing of all tools available and screening criteria used  is beyond the scope of this single post. However, I like to share with you the desirable qualities of such tools used to carry out the screening which are namely (i) accuracy of the tool(sensitivity and specificity), (ii) easy to use, (iii) reliable so as to produce similar results with repeat testing in the same circumstances and with different users where the patient’s state has not changed it must be acceptable to those being screened, (iv) does not require extensive training, and (v) does not need additional equipment.

For your information too, two commonly used tools developed for hospital-wide application and used with older adults are (i) Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), and (ii) Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST).

Information through these kinds of screening criteria tools provides insight into the patient’s overall physical health. The information may also indicate that patients at risk for nutritional problems according to the criteria, receive further or more in-depth assessment of nutritional status or functional status, including a fall-risk assessment.   This information is viewed as the most effective way and an essential first step in the management of patients’ nutritional care.

The more in-depth assessment mentioned above may be necessary to identify the problem or potential nutrition risk(s) for those high risk patients in need of nutritional interventions and patients in need of rehabilitation services or other services related to their ability to function independently or at their greatest potential. Nurses refer these patients in need of a functional assessment according to the criteria to the hospital Dietitian for full nutrition assessment.. The dietitian will usually first review the medical record of referred patients. Everything from diagnosis, social history, medical history, medication, laboratory data and assessment, and evaluations performed by other medical/clinical personnel are scrutinised  According to Jacqueline (2011), reading the medical record which contains the notes of other clinicians provides necessary context for effective management of the condition(s) being assessed. A dietitian may then take anthropometric measurements in addition to a subjective nutritional assessment.

Subjective data pertaining to the nutritional assessment, identify abnormal findings and client strengths which could include for example, Patient A who is a female, stated age 42 years; reports she had a fever for 2 days a week ago; drinks 4 to 6 glasses of water daily) and anthropometric measurements i.e the objective data could include for example, Height: 5 feet, 5 inches (165 cm); body frame: medium; weight: 128 lb (58 kg); BMI: 21.3). The data is usually clustered to reveal any significant patterns or abnormalities. These data may then be used to make clinical judgments about the status of the patient’s nutritional health.

At this point, I like you to take note that the dietitian uses assessments techniques which vary for the mother and unborn child as well as the complications associated with pregnancy, the lactating mother, infants and children.

Once the dietitian has a a clear understanding of the medical diagnosis and its nutritional implications, intervention is initiated, the patient is carefully monitored to ensure that goals are met and the desired outcome is achieved.

Do take note that if you are working at a hospital which is already Joint Commission International (JCI) accredited or seeking JCI accreditation status or undergoing re-survey for JCI accreditation status, your hospital will need to comply with JCI Standard AOP.1.6 which states that “Patients are screened for nutritional status and functional needs and are referred for further assessment and treatment when necessary.”

I am sure you are already aware that your hospital has in place a program which evaluates its patients’ risk for falls – which could include fall history, medications-and-alcohol-consumption review, gait and balance screening, and walking aids used by the patient, and monitors both the intended and unintended consequences – for example, the inappropriate use of physical restraints or fluid intake restriction which may result in injury, impaired circulation, or compromised skin integrity of measures, taken to reduce falls.

JCI believes that compliance to JCI Standard AOP.1.6 as part of the initial assessment using criteria developed by qualified individuals to identify patients who require further functional assessment, further strengthens a hospital’s fall-risk reduction program.

It is common in hospitals when patients are provided dietetic services after dietary orders by the doctor attending are documented in the patient medical record. Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners will find within medical records, progress notes with the nutritional care of the patient met in accordance with the doctor’s orders and also the Dietary Progress Note, a progress note documented by the hospital dietitian as part of recognised dietary practices which includes:

  • patient’s dietary needs
  • any dietary observations made by staff (e.g., amount of meal consumed,food likes/dislikes, and so on)

HIM / MR practitioners who are members of a closed Medical Record Review, need to be aware that the Medical Record Review Tool will assess and determine the degree of compliance with standards and elements of performance relating to nutrition care given by the JCI Standard AOP.1.6, when there is evidence in the medical record of patients screened for nutritional status and functional needs.

References:

  1. Jacqueline, CM, 2011, Detitian’s guide to assessment and documentation, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA, USA
  2. Janet, W, & Jane HK, 2010, Health assessment in nursing, 4th edn, Wolters Kluwer Health, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  3. Joint Commission International, 2010, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th edn, JCI, USA
  4. Nutritional screening and assessment, Nursing Times.net, viewed 17 February 2013, < http://www.nursingtimes.net/nutritional-screening-and-assessment/199381.article >
  5. Using nutritional screening tools to identify malnourished patients, Nursing Times.net, viewed 17 February 2013, < http://www.nursingtimes.net/nursing-practice/clinical-zones/nutrition/using-nutritional-screening-tools-to-identify-malnourished-patients/1958881.article >
  6. Michelle, AG & Mary, JB 2011, Essentials of Health Information Management: Principles and Practices, 2nd edn, Delmar, Cengage Learning, NY, USA
  7. Sue, CD & Patricia, KL 2011, Fundamentals of Nursing: Standards & Practice, 4th edn, Delmar, Cengage Learning, NY, USA

Remaining 3 posts on medical record documentation

I have based my previous posts on medical record documentation on the Joint Commission International (JCI) Standards found in the Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th Edition and The Joint Commission International Accreditation Hospital Survey Process Guide, 3rd Edition.

To round-up writing about all matters related to medical record documentation based on JCI’s Standards, I have recently discovered in the course of my study of the above mentioned manual/guide, that I need to write about three assessment activities to include under medical record documentation, before I can categorically state I have completed all of the required contents of a medical record to fully satisfy all JCI’s Standards related to medical record documentation and the process of a closed Medical Records Review.

To this effect, the remaining 3 posts on medical record documentation will cover :

  1. the information gathered at the initial medical and/or nursing assessment when patients are screened for nutritional status and functional needs and are referred for further assessment and treatment when necessary, including a fall-risk assessment;
  2. the need for discharge planning at the initial assessment for those patients for whom discharge planning is critical due to age, lack of mobility, continuing medical and nursing needs, or assistance with activities of daily living, among others; and
  3. reassessment conducted by a doctor in the ongoing patient care and when results are noted in the patient’s medical record for the information and use of all those caring for the patient.

For Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners working at a hospital which is already JCI accredited or seeking JCI accreditation status or undergoing re-survey for JCI accreditation statusyou will need to take note that all of the 3 assessment activities listed above are included in the closed Medical Records Review.Tool. 

References:
Joint Commission International 2010, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, 4th edn, JCI, USA

Joint Commission International 2010, The Joint Commission International Accreditation Hospital Survey Process Guide, 3rd edn, JCI, USA

Laws of Malaysia (LOM) which may affect healthcare in Malaysia

Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners in Malaysia need to be aware of government statutes – especially those which may directly or indirectly affect healthcare in general and HIM / MR management in particular in Malaysia, while they go about discharging the duties.

I have a list below of Malaysian laws which I think may directly or indirectly affect healthcare in Malaysia. This is just a list in alphabetical order, and I suggest Health Information Management (HIM) / Medical Records (MR) practitioners explore any of them to increase their legal awareness to help them understand their legal rights, remedies, responsibilities & obligations.

I am no law expert, and this condensed list (each table of this list will open in a new tab of your current window for a larger view of each table) will not be here on this post if not for the complete list of the Laws of Malaysia (LOM) series available online from Mylawyer.com.my (this link will open in a new tab of your current browser window), Malaysia’s free online legal resource, providing free legal information, articles, and government statutes. To quote Mylawyer.com.my :

“the following …… alphabetical list of laws in the Laws of Malaysia (LOM) series up to Act 655. The LOM series is a compilation and reprint of laws published in volume form pursuant to Section 14A of the Revision of Laws Act 1968 [Act 1]. It is the only official and authoritative publication of the laws of Malaysia. The LOM series incorporates all principal laws of Malaysia enacted after 1969 and pre-1969 laws which have been revised by the Commissioner of Law Revision. There are 40 volumes in the LOM series comprising the Federal Constitution in volume 1 and Acts 1 to 655 from volumes 2 to 40. The LOM series incorporates all amendments up to 1 January 2006 except otherwise indicated in the relevant law.”

Slide1 Slide2

Suggestions are welcome to improve this list.

I have also quoted some of these laws from the list above in previous post of the blog.

References:
MyLawyer.com.my, 2013, viewed 9 February 2013,< http://www.mylawyer.com.my/index.php >

MSQH – Introductory Post

MSQH-SS-7MSQH short for the Malaysian Society for Quality in Health, is the sole Malaysian accreditation body with nationally established standards for health care facilities and services since 1997, dedicated to improving the quality of Malaysia’s health care through voluntary accreditation.

MSQH’s standards cover all aspects of healthcare, beginning with the patient’s point of entry into the healthcare system, patient’s interphase with healthcare providers, staff ethics, training and their competencies and outcomes of care.

MSQH avails that its standards are at par with other hospital accreditation standards like the Joint Commission International (JCI) Standards after the International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) had granted MSQH the highly esteemed honor that “accredits the accreditors” and provides worldwide recognition for accredited organisations like MSQH that meet approved international standards under ISQua’s International Accreditation Program (IAP).  This highly esteemed honor for the period from August 2008 to July 2012 reinforces that MSQH’s standards meet the highest international benchmark.

Effective January 2013, all MSQH accredited hospitals are surveyed once every four years, submit the 18 month and 30 month compliance reports, and will also undergo ‘Surprise Surveillance’ for continuous compliance based on the 4th Edition of the MSQH Hospital Accreditation Standards.

In this introductory post and in subsequent posts, I shall begin blogging about the MSQH SERVICE STANDARD 7 Health Information Management System based on the 4th Edition of the MSQH Hospital Accreditation Standards.

This standard is divided into 6 topics as follows:

TOPIC 7.1: ORGANISATION AND MANAGEMENT

TOPIC 7.2: HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT

TOPIC 7.3: POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

TOPIC 7.4: FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT

TOPIC 7.5: SAFETY AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES

TOPIC 7.6: SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

Topic 1 to Topic 5 each have one standard, while Topic 6 has 2 standards. All the standards have a list of criteria for compliance.

I shall be writing about Topic 7.1 in my next post on MSQH SERVICE STANDARD 7.

References:
Malaysian Society for Quality in Health 2013, About, viewed 2 February 2013, <http://www.msqh.com.my/web/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=46&Itemid=54>

Malaysian Society for Quality in Health 2013, CEO’s Message, viewed 2 February 2013, <http://www.msqh.com.my/web/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=52&Itemid=61>