EHR data and AI to predict response to antidepressant treatment

Antidepressants are frequently prescribed for adults with depression, a common and often disabling psychiatric condition. However, identifying the most effective treatment for a particular patient is often a trial-and-error process that can result in prolonged morbidity, disability, and exposure to adverse effects, as well as substantial healthcare costs. Precision psychiatry aims to optimise treatment matching using patient-specific profiles, but there are few evidence-based predictors available to clinicians initiating antidepressant treatment.

Although average response rates are similar across different antidepressant classes, individual responses can vary widely in clinical practice. Therefore, accurately and scalably guiding antidepressant selection presents specific challenges. The gold standard for characterising antidepressant response from electronic health records (EHRs) remains expert chart review, which is labor- and time-intensive.

However, advances in machine learning (ML) and the growing availability of large-scale health data, such as EHRs, offer new opportunities for developing clinical decision-support tools that may address this challenge. In a recent study published in the peer-reviewed open-access medical journal Nature Partner Journals (npc) Digital Medicine, researchers used machine learning models to accurately predict differential treatment response probabilities for patients and between antidepressant classes based on real-world EHR data. The pipeline incorporated AI and non-AI features, as well as unstructured data (i.e. clinical notes) to maximize the use of information contained in EHRs.

The study included 17,556 patients who received a new antidepressant prescription from non-psychiatrists, and data were obtained from 20 years of EHRs spanning from January 1990 to August 2018. The patients had at least one International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for depression and at least one ICD code for non-recurrent depression during their history.

ICD codes from EHR data were obtained for adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with at least one visit (the first visit with an antidepressant prescription is defined as the “index visit” for each patient) with a diagnostic ICD code for a depressive disorder (defined as ICD-9-CM: 296.20–6, 296.30–6, and 311; ICD-10-CM: F32.0–9, F33.0–9) co-occurring with an antidepressant prescription, and at least one ICD code for non-recurrent depression (ICD-9-CM: 296.20–6 and 311; ICD-10-CM: F32.0–9) any time during their history.

The resulting models achieved good accuracy, discrimination, and positive predictive value, which could be valuable for further efforts aiming to provide clinical decision support for prescribers. However, the researchers noted several limitations, including missing data in EHRs(e.g. patients who may receive some of their care outside of the healthcare system), and secular trends in clinician prescribing or documentation practices that may have affected model performance.

In summary, the study presents a novel computational pipeline based on real-world EHR data for predicting differential responses to commonly used classes of antidepressants. The approach demonstrated here could be adapted to a wide variety of other clinical applications for optimising and individualising treatment selection.

REFERENCES:

  1. Sheu, Yh., Magdamo, C., Miller, M. et al. AI-assisted prediction of differential response to antidepressant classes using electronic health records. npj Digit. Med. 6, 73 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00817-8


2014 Report finds the U.S. ranks last among 11 countries for Health Care Quality

The Commonwealth Fund (TCF), a private foundation headquarted in New York City and started by a woman philanthropist Anna M. Harkness and established in 1918, aims to promote (TCF 2014) “a high performing health care system that achieves better access, improved quality, and greater efficiency, particularly for society’s most vulnerable, including low-income people, the uninsured, minority Americans, young children, and elderly adults.”

The TCF produces more than 100 publications a year. In its 2014 edition of Mirror, Mirror, a study entitled “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall” reports data analysed from 11 western, industrialised nations which incorporates patients’ and physicians’ survey results on care experiences and ratings on various dimensions of care. Researchers had analysed in each of those countries that related to five overall performance areas relating to Health, Quality, Efficiency, Access,and Equity.

Once again, even in the 2014 “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall” report, the U.S. health care system has shown that it underperformed relative to the other 11 countries surveyed, and ranked last among them despite the U.S. spending far more on health care per capita and been the most expensive in the world.

The chart below shows how the overall rankings (click on the image to open a new tab of your current browser window to view a larger image).

How the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally 2014

Image credit : The Commonwealth Fund

Combing through the report, I found the following references to health information systems:

  1. timely information not reaching doctors, thus affecting health outcomes, quality, and efficiency;
  2. adoption of modern health information systems and meaningful use of health information technology systems can encourage the efficient organisation and delivery of health care; and
  3. medical records or administrative data capture important dimensions of effectiveness or efficiency, thus in any attempt to assess the relative performance of countries, medical records or administrative data captured must be included to minimise inherent limitations in similar studies when only patients’ and physicians’ assessments are used, since patients’ and physicians’ experiences and expectations which could differ by country and culture, and thus could affect findings from such studies.

References:

  1. The Commonwealth Fund (TCF) 2014, About Us, viewed 18 June 2014, <http://www.commonwealthfund.org/about-us>
  2. The Commonwealth Fund (TCF) 2014, Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, 2014 Update: How the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally, viewed 18 June 2014, <http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2014/jun/mirror-mirror?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=>
Page-&-Post-footer

 

Understanding reasons for making a request to change the medical record

It is rare to find any research topic ever published on why requests are made by patients who want to make changes to their medical record. I found one recently, and here to share with you what researchers discovered as the main reasons for making a request to change the medical record, and what types of information they wanted changed, and whether they result in modifications to the medical record.

In their qualitative research, the researchers studied content analysis of all patient-initiated amendment requests, an ‘amendment request’ defined as the process by which patients ask for changes to be made to their records, received over a 7-year period.

Readers can now view the infographic below (click on the infographic to view a larger image in a new tab of your current window) which shows a summary of all relevant findings from this research.

Medical-Records-Amendment-Requests-Study

Also from this study, I deduced that when patients were given the opportunity to further participate in their care by allowing them to review their medical record, their medical record accuracy could lead to improvement after the identification and correction of errors or omissions.

I agree with the authors that doctors can make mistakes in the medical record, and that it is necessary to correct these mistakes at some point This is especially true when a patient discovers any mistake or omission upon reviewing his or her own medical record. However, it is uncommon when a patient will not want any information there anyway but such requests must be expected.

An ‘amendment request’ is a rare request as most patients, in the developing and under-developed world and even perhaps in the developed countries are unaware of the basic right to review their own medical record and the absence of any policy to grant patients the right to make an ‘amendment request’.

References:

  1. David A Hanauer, Rebecca Preib, Kai Zheng, Sung W Choi 2014, Patient-initiated electronic health record amendment requests, J Am Med Inform Assoc amiajnl-2013-002574 Published Online First: 26 May 2014 doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002574, viewed 1 June 2014, <http://medicalresearch.com/author-interviews/electronic-medical-records-study-examines-patient-initiated-amendment-requests/5721/>
Page-&-Post-footer

Flavius and Septimus

Last night I stumbled upon this article about change and when one crosses over into the Twilight Zone, from the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS),  head-quartered in Chicago, and with additional offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, is a cause-based, not-for-profit organization global enterprise producing health information technology (IT) thought leadership, education, events, market research and media services around the world, focused on better health through IT.

I think the story strikes an analogy that is relevant to everyday challenges in life and to any profession  as we struggle  to transition from the present which is rooted in the past (as we cling on the present so stubbornly because we fear change) to the future with a vision.

The story is of a man at work, Gaius Flavius Lautumiae who is the emperor’s royal stonecutter, stone-cutting has been the only work he knows and ever known in his whole life. The scene – the emperor’s royal quarry where Flavius is working on a stone monument for the recently deceased emperor.  The dialogue with his close friend, Septimus goes like this ….…

SEPTIMUS: But Flavius, the whole world, all of civilization has made the change.  Even the Celts!  Think about it: even the primitive Celts have gone over.
FLAVIUS: I tell you, Septimus, it matters not which barbarian hordes have changed their ways!  We Romans have been using these numbers since the time of Julius Caesar, even before the emperors came to be.  If it was good for them, it is good for us, and it will be good for our children.
SEPTIMUS: Flavius, come to your senses.  You know that the royal son will become the emperor after that stone you are cutting has been set in place.  We have all been warned that he comes to the palace with countless scrolls filled with writings telling us about new ways to do many things.  The new ways will become our ways.  It will be decreed.
FLAVIUS: Septimus, you should know that it was the old ways that got us here, and it will be the old ways that take us to tomorrow.
SEPTIMUS: But Flavius, have you even looked at the new numbers?  They are amazing!  One simple stroke and a value can be recorded.
FLAVIUS: Bah!  You call all of those circles and curves simple?  They’re a nightmare!
SEPTIMUS: As a stonecutter, you may see it that way. But everyone who has made the change attests that the new numbers are a wonder.  A wonder!  They open many new vistas for us. This new system will allow our civilization to progress. Without it, I fear that Rome may no longer be… Rome.
FLAVIUS: I cannot accept the change.  I see no reason to change.  I care not for new vistas; I just desire to cut my stone with simple, straight lines.

Flavius is an example of an individual who continues to live in the yesterday, its memories are all that is what he wants, yesterday is what he will get and tomorrow will never come for him.

Is CHANGE good or bad?

Georg  C. Lichtenberg  (1 July 1742 – 24 February 1799), who was a German scientist, satirist and Anglophile (a person who greatly admires or favours England and things English) once said “I cannot say whether things will get better if we change; what I can say is that they must change if they are to get better.”, and I trust him so just to take him at his word.

References:

  1. No Time Like the Past, News, Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), viewed 29 May 2013, <http://www.himss.org/News/NewsDetail.aspx?ItemNumber=18547>

Findings revealing workarounds to overcome design flaws in electronic health records (EHRs)

A new study in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA), which directly observed clinical workflows at primary care clinics in different healthcare organisations in Boston and Indianapolis, USA found that both doctors and medical staff used both paper-based and computer-based workarounds to overcome design flaws in their electronic health records (EHRs).

Here are some examples from the study’s findings of workarounds created when practices are found not using the EHR in the way it was designed for, due to the real and perceived deficiencies ot the EHRs.

workarounds-for-EHR-flaws

References:

  1. Ken, T, 2013, Healthcare Workarounds Expose EHR Flaws, InformationWeek Healthcare, viewed 26 March 2013, < http://www.informationweek.com/healthcare/electronic-medical-records/healthcare-workarounds-expose-ehr-flaws/240151710 >