Infographics

This is a list of visualisations (infographics) found in this blog that are beautiful and engaging, easier to understand than words alone.

You can view a larger image of any of the following infographics posted in this blog by first clicking on any of the links list below, which will open a new tab in your current window to display a post from this blog showing the relevant infographic image. Second, click the infographic image from the post in the new tab of your current window. You will then see the larger image of the infographic in another new tab in your current window.

 

Electronic vs Paper medical records
The infographic in this post is a typical scenario of “missing” medical records, and offsite storage which continues to post many problems from logistics to damaged medical records.

ICD 11 – history of the development of the ICD from 1853 to 2015
A showcase of all the past revisions of ICD leading to ICD 11 expected in 2015.

ICD 10 & ICD 11 Development – How What, Why & When
An infographic that summarises facts on ICD 10 & ICD 11 Development – How, What, Why & When, which are by no means exhaustive.

What is Big Data?
Key facts about Big Data
.

Format Of ICD-10 Diagnosis Code
A self-explanatory ICD 10 code infographic example.

Top 20 Most Popular EMR Software Solutions
A good visual for about EMRs solutions out there.

What is the Cloud?
The Cloud is the Internet.

Technology vs Paper – A Recent History of Medical Records
Most of us accept that medical records are still kept in paper files, and that’s the way it is.

EHR vs. Traditional Paper Records
Differences between EHR(EMR) and traditional paper-based records.

Diabetes Control Chart
To tell you what Glycated/Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c or A1c test) is all about.

Recent Posts

EHR data and AI to predict response to antidepressant treatment

Antidepressants are frequently prescribed for adults with depression, a common and often disabling psychiatric condition. However, identifying the most effective treatment for a particular patient is often a trial-and-error process that can result in prolonged morbidity, disability, and exposure to adverse effects, as well as substantial healthcare costs. Precision psychiatry aims to optimise treatment matching using patient-specific profiles, but there are few evidence-based predictors available to clinicians initiating antidepressant treatment.

Although average response rates are similar across different antidepressant classes, individual responses can vary widely in clinical practice. Therefore, accurately and scalably guiding antidepressant selection presents specific challenges. The gold standard for characterising antidepressant response from electronic health records (EHRs) remains expert chart review, which is labor- and time-intensive.

However, advances in machine learning (ML) and the growing availability of large-scale health data, such as EHRs, offer new opportunities for developing clinical decision-support tools that may address this challenge. In a recent study published in the peer-reviewed open-access medical journal Nature Partner Journals (npc) Digital Medicine, researchers used machine learning models to accurately predict differential treatment response probabilities for patients and between antidepressant classes based on real-world EHR data. The pipeline incorporated AI and non-AI features, as well as unstructured data (i.e. clinical notes) to maximize the use of information contained in EHRs.

The study included 17,556 patients who received a new antidepressant prescription from non-psychiatrists, and data were obtained from 20 years of EHRs spanning from January 1990 to August 2018. The patients had at least one International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for depression and at least one ICD code for non-recurrent depression during their history.

ICD codes from EHR data were obtained for adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with at least one visit (the first visit with an antidepressant prescription is defined as the “index visit” for each patient) with a diagnostic ICD code for a depressive disorder (defined as ICD-9-CM: 296.20–6, 296.30–6, and 311; ICD-10-CM: F32.0–9, F33.0–9) co-occurring with an antidepressant prescription, and at least one ICD code for non-recurrent depression (ICD-9-CM: 296.20–6 and 311; ICD-10-CM: F32.0–9) any time during their history.

The resulting models achieved good accuracy, discrimination, and positive predictive value, which could be valuable for further efforts aiming to provide clinical decision support for prescribers. However, the researchers noted several limitations, including missing data in EHRs(e.g. patients who may receive some of their care outside of the healthcare system), and secular trends in clinician prescribing or documentation practices that may have affected model performance.

In summary, the study presents a novel computational pipeline based on real-world EHR data for predicting differential responses to commonly used classes of antidepressants. The approach demonstrated here could be adapted to a wide variety of other clinical applications for optimising and individualising treatment selection.

REFERENCES:

  1. Sheu, Yh., Magdamo, C., Miller, M. et al. AI-assisted prediction of differential response to antidepressant classes using electronic health records. npj Digit. Med. 6, 73 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00817-8


  1. Implementing the EMR system in hospitals nationwide Leave a reply
  2. World Tuberculosis Day 2023 Leave a reply
  3. Special allocation for HKL for digitalisation of patient records Leave a reply
  4. International Pi Day 2023 Leave a reply